Field notes The Energy Transition for the Rest of Us

Catalyst N° 060 of 125 24 Apr 2025

The geopolitics of rare earth elements

with Ahmad Ghahreman, co-founder and CEO, Cyclic Materials

In this note
  1. 01The question
  2. 02The answer
  3. 03The argument
  4. 04What you need to know first
  5. 05Details worth keeping
  6. 06Claims worth citing
  7. 07Where it’s contested

The question

China controls the rare earth supply chain more completely than any other critical mineral, and has started using that control as leverage. Can a supply chain be built outside it?

The answer

Eventually, and only partly. Ghahreman, who flags that he is an optimist by disposition, says the light rare earths are tractable because 37 percent of mining already happens outside China and separation and magnet plants are being built in the West. The heavy rare earths are the hard part, because the deposits are geologically concentrated in China and the non-Chinese ones that do carry them are undeveloped, so his immediate answer there is recycling end-of-life products.

03The argument

The place to start is that this is not really a minerals story, it is a magnets story. Rare earth elements are a modest market on their own, which Ghahreman sizes loosely at somewhere between a few billion and $25 billion, but the magnets made from them unlock multi-trillion dollar markets downstream, because the strongest magnets available make the most efficient electric motors. Ghahreman’s account is that China worked this out 25 to 30 years ago and built the chain deliberately from mining through separation, metallization and magnet manufacture. The resulting position is different in kind from China’s position in lithium or copper, a distinction Kann draws explicitly: in those markets the mining happens elsewhere and China dominates refining, so the material has to come to China and then leave again. In rare earths China also holds the majority of the mining, and then vacuums in everyone else’s concentrates on top of that.

Within that, one number does most of the work. Roughly 63 percent of mining, 90 percent of processing and 93 percent of magnet manufacturing sit in China, but 99 percent of heavy rare earths, chiefly dysprosium and terbium, are produced and consumed inside China. That last figure is a geological fact rather than an industrial-policy one: heavy rare earths happen to be concentrated in Chinese deposits, and MP Materials in the United States has essentially none of them despite having plenty of the light neodymium and praseodymium. Heavy rare earths are what let a magnet tolerate heat, which is exactly what an electric vehicle motor does when the car is driven at 70 or 80 miles an hour. So the chokepoint is not rare earths in general, it is the specific elements that make high-performance motors work, and it is the part of the chain least amenable to simply opening a Western mine. Ghahreman is careful about why. Resources carrying heavy rare earths do exist outside China, in Brazil and elsewhere, but those projects have not been advanced and none of the deposits are being mined today, partly because Chinese-set prices have made such projects unattractive from time to time.

The leverage has been applied in steps rather than all at once, and Ghahreman’s reading is that each step built the capability for the next. December 2023 banned the export of the equipment and technology for processing and magnet manufacturing, not the materials, which he says did not get enough attention and which has since stranded Western projects that had planned to buy Chinese equipment. Summer 2024 consolidated and nationalized the domestic industry, giving the government control from pricing through end product. Then, three weeks before recording, export controls landed on the materials themselves: oxides, metals, heavy rare earth alloys and finished magnets. His argument for why this matters is procedural. Building a licensing process, where every batch needs paperwork identifying the destination country and end buyer, is something a government does only when it intends to use it. On that reasoning he expects the tool to be used more, and his stated strong belief is that China is not a reliable source of rare earth magnets going forward, because it will use supply to change behavior abroad.

Which is what makes recycling structural rather than incidental. Twenty years of imported products containing magnets have accumulated in the United States and Europe as what he calls the largest overground deposit of rare earths, and it has two properties virgin mining does not. The separation of the useful elements out of the basket of seventeen already happened once, when the original magnet was made, so the feedstock arrives pre-sorted. And older products are richer in heavy rare earths, because manufacturers were more generous with them ten or fifteen years ago before cost and availability pressure pushed engineering teams to design them down. So the waste stream is disproportionately rich in precisely the elements the West does not currently mine. That is the closest thing the episode offers to an answer on heavy rare earths, and it is a partial one: it recovers what was already imported, and does nothing about future demand growth.

04What you need to know first

Light versus heavy rare earths
Seventeen elements come out of the ground together, but only a handful matter for magnets. Light ones, neodymium and praseodymium, provide the basic magnetic strength. Heavy ones, dysprosium and terbium, provide heat tolerance. The distinction is the whole episode, because supply concentration is far worse for the heavies.
The four steps of the chain
Mining, separation (splitting the basket into individual elements), metallization (oxides to metal), and magnet manufacture. Export controls and technology bans have been applied at different steps at different times, so “China restricted rare earths” is ambiguous without saying which step.
Export control versus export ban
A control is a licensing regime: shipment is legal but requires per-batch paperwork and government approval, which makes it a dial rather than a switch. Ghahreman’s point is that the dial can be turned without any further announcement.
Urban mining
Recovering materials from end-of-life products rather than ore. Here it means pulling magnets out of discarded equipment and vehicles.

05Details worth keeping

  • The December 2023 technology and equipment ban has bitten in a way that is easy to miss: Ghahreman says he knows of companies that built plans around Chinese process equipment and are now unable to bring it into the United States or Europe, and their projects are suffering as a result.
  • Part of the barrier is intellectual property rather than physics. Chinese magnet makers have spent years building patent portfolios on making strong magnets with minimal heavy rare earth content. He believes the West can develop its own processes, but not buy the Chinese ones.
  • Export quotas are not new. He says China has controlled how much it exports for 10 to 15 years. The genuinely new developments were the 2024 consolidation and the 2025 per-batch licensing.
  • Heavy rare earths were singled out by name in the control documents, which he reads as a deliberate signal rather than administrative detail.
  • Build-out he cites outside China: Vacuumschmelze constructing a large magnet plant in South Carolina, MP Materials and others adding separation capacity in Texas, a partner plant just started in France, and Lynas building in Texas, which he hedges with “I believe.”
  • The precedent he points to for a full ban is germanium and gallium, which China banned from export a couple of years earlier.
  • Commercial signal from the disruption: Cyclic spoke to more automakers and others in the three weeks after the controls than in the previous year and a half.
  • Kann opens by saying the media coverage of this has been poor, often conflating rare earths with critical minerals generally and rarely distinguishing between the individual elements or what the controls actually cover.

06Claims worth citing

All figures as stated on 2025-04-24, in the middle of an actively escalating trade dispute. The supply-share percentages are the durable part; the state of shipments and licensing is not.

  • 63 percent of rare earth mining, 90 percent of processing and refining, and 93 percent of magnet manufacturing happen in China. Ghahreman
  • 99 percent of heavy rare earths, specifically terbium and dysprosium, are produced and consumed within China. Ghahreman
  • Rare earth elements are a market of a few billion to $20 billion or $25 billion dollars; the magnets made from them unlock multi-trillion dollar markets. He states the element-market figure loosely, giving both a “few billion” and a “20, 25 billion” number in the same sentence. Ghahreman
  • Seventeen rare earth elements exist; only a few are critical, and those are the magnet elements. Ghahreman names five: neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, terbium and cerium. The count of five is Kann’s phrasing, “up to five of them, in some cases less than that,” which Ghahreman does not dispute; Cyclic’s own product is later described as containing five. Ghahreman and Kann
  • December 2023: China banned export of equipment and technology for rare earth processing and magnet manufacturing. Summer 2024: consolidation and nationalization of the domestic industry. Approximately three weeks before recording: export controls on oxides, metals, heavy rare earth alloys and magnets. Ghahreman
  • Companies have been waiting roughly two months for export-control documentation and have been told to expect a few more months before the licensing process is fully in place. The two months does not square cleanly with the controls having landed three weeks earlier, and he does not reconcile the two. Ghahreman, from his own conversations with companies
  • Magnets, oxides, metals and alloys are all currently delayed in shipment, with immediate effects on automakers and makers of e-bikes and e-scooters. Ghahreman
  • Cyclic’s mixed rare earth oxide product contains five rare earth elements rather than seventeen, and heavy rare earths are often close to 10 percent of the product, which the company describes as among the highest in the market. Cyclic Materials, via Ghahreman
  • MP Materials’ US deposit has almost no heavy rare earths but substantial neodymium and praseodymium. Ghahreman

07Where it’s contested

  • Kann’s read of the current disruption is corrected by the guest. Kann summarizes the situation as more uncertainty than actual disruption, with flows continuing unabated so far. Ghahreman says it is more than that: magnets, oxides, metals and alloys are not shipping today. The guest’s version is the one to carry.
  • The optimism is self-flagged. Ghahreman prefaces his answer on whether the West can build an alternative chain by saying he is an optimistic person and giving an optimistic perspective. His argument, that 37 percent of mining is outside China so the raw material exists, applies far better to light rare earths than to the heavies he has just said are 99 percent Chinese, and he does not reconcile the two.
  • The forecast of further escalation is inference, not information. He says explicitly that he has no crystal ball and is connecting dots. His case that a full export ban is the next step rests on the germanium and gallium precedent and on the logic that a government builds a licensing process because it intends to use it.
  • Timing is left vague throughout. “It won’t happen within 24 hours, but if we really want it to happen and we spend money on it, it’ll eventually happen” is the closest thing to a schedule for standing up a Western chain. No year is offered.
  • Product figures are the company’s own. The heavy rare earth content of Cyclic’s product and its position relative to the market are stated by the founder about his own output, and Cyclic is an Energy Impact Partners investment, which Kann discloses on air.
  • Transcript quality caveat. The guest’s name is rendered as both Ghahreman and “Garman,” and the machine transcription repeatedly mangles “rare earth” to “rarer,” “sediments” and similar. Read the source before quoting any phrasing precisely.

Cite as: “The geopolitics of rare earth elements,” The Energy Transition for the Rest of Us, note on Catalyst with Shayle Kann, April 24, 2025. CC BY 4.0. View the Markdown