Field notes The Energy Transition for the Rest of Us

Catalyst N° 001 of 125 17 Nov 2022

Fixing cement’s carbon problem

with Leah Ellis, co-founder and CEO, Sublime Systems

In this note
  1. 01The question
  2. 02The answer
  3. 03The argument
  4. 04What you need to know first
  5. 05Details worth keeping
  6. 06Claims worth citing
  7. 07Where it’s contested

The question

Cement releases carbon dioxide twice over, once from the fuel and once from the rock itself. Which of the proposed fixes actually gets both to zero?

The answer

Only one incumbent option reaches zero and it leaves you holding the gas: blending other materials into Portland cement caps out around 30%, alternative fuels and electrified heat touch only the fuel half, and post-combustion capture covers both but hands you a large stream of CO2 to dispose of. Sublime’s answer is to skip the 1,500-degree kiln entirely and pull calcium out of rock electrochemically at room temperature, which addresses both halves at once and, with a non-limestone feedstock, produces no CO2 at all. What comes out is not Portland cement, though, so the route depends on an industry shift toward specifying what cement must do rather than what it must be made of.

03The argument

Start with why cement is a distinctive decarbonization problem rather than merely a large one. Cement is made in a long rotary kiln tilted at about five degrees; rocks tumble down it and two reactions happen on the way. At around 1,000 degrees Celsius limestone breaks into calcium oxide and CO2, which escapes as gas. Further down, at roughly 1,500 degrees, the calcium fuses with silicates into Portland cement. Ellis puts roughly half the emissions down to burning fossil fuel to reach those temperatures and roughly half to the limestone itself, which works out to about a ton of CO2 per ton of cement. The two halves are independent, and that is the whole difficulty. Solve the industrial heat problem and the chemistry is untouched; solve the chemistry and the heat is untouched. Kann puts it that way and Ellis agrees.

That independence is what makes each familiar pathway partial. Alternative fuels, burning tires or biomass instead of coal, address only the heat. Supplementary cementitious materials, the silicates blended into cement, work because hydrated Portland cement leaves more calcium floating around than the hardened phase needs; extra silicates soak it up and improve density and durability, which is why the industry blended them for decades on cost grounds long before carbon was the reason. But you can only go to about 30% before the silicates overshoot and performance dilutes, so you are still buying 70% Portland cement and, as Kann puts it and Ellis accepts, getting at best a 30% reduction. Fly ash, the most popular of these materials, comes from coal plants that are closing, and Ellis adds that whether it counts as sustainable depends on how you allocate its embodied carbon between the electricity and the ash. Curing concrete with injected CO2 puts some carbon back, and hardened concrete recarbonates naturally anyway, but only the limestone half is ever recoverable that way, the natural version takes decades to a century or more, and carbonation is simultaneously a degradation reaction. That leaves post-combustion capture as effectively the only route that takes Portland cement itself to zero, which is why it appears in every major cement company’s net-zero-by-2050 plan, and it hands you a CO2 stream that still needs pipelines and permanent storage.

Sublime attacks the process rather than its exhaust. Ellis’s background is electrochemistry, batteries specifically, and the company’s move is to dissolve calcium out of a calcium-bearing mineral and precipitate it in a second step, at ambient temperature, on electricity rather than flame, and tolerant of intermittent supply. Two feedstocks are possible and they lead to different places. Start from limestone and the calcium comes out without thermal decomposition, leaving pure cold compressed CO2 as an inherent byproduct, which Ellis says makes capture cost less than $10 a ton but still requires somewhere for the gas to go. Start instead from one of the non-limestone calcium-bearing minerals, largely silicates, and there is no CO2 at all, and the silicate you pulled the calcium out of is itself an ingredient of the cement.

The catch sits in what you get. Without the 1,500-degree step there is no tricalcium silicate, the phase responsible for Portland cement’s fast set and early strength, so the product is not Portland cement. Ellis’s claim is that the final hardened phase is the same, and it is the hardened phase that carries compressive strength and durability. Whether that is commercially sufficient is a question about specification rather than chemistry, which is why the most consequential part of the episode is about standards. Cement was historically specified by chemistry, meaning a required percentage of tricalcium silicate. That is giving way to performance-based standards: blended-cement standards permitting 50% Portland plus 50% of almost anything that passes the tests, and fully performance-based standards where the structural engineer asks only that it work. Kann draws the conclusion and Ellis endorses it, that if those standards take hold the market stops being defined by a formulation and a cement that never needed limestone becomes possible. The economics point the same direction, because every other decarbonization route is an energy adder and electric heat is inherently less efficient than direct combustion, whereas Ellis claims Sublime’s process matches Portland cement’s embodied energy today with a path to half. And a green premium on cement is small where it lands, since she puts labor at roughly 90% of installed cost and materials at about 5%, making the premium budget dust to a building owner while being one of the larger levers on a company’s scope 3 emissions.

04What you need to know first

Cement versus concrete
Concrete is cement, sand, aggregate and water. Cement is the glue, about 10% of concrete by mass, and nearly all the industrial emissions sit in it.
Process emissions
The CO2 released by the limestone as it decomposes, independent of how the kiln is heated. This is the half that fuel switching cannot touch.
Tricalcium silicate and calcium silicate hydrate
The first is the phase that only forms at about 1,500 degrees and gives Portland cement its fast set. The second is what cement turns into once water is added, and it is what actually holds a building up. Sublime’s argument turns on producing the second without the first.
Performance-based standards
Specifying cement by what it must achieve under test rather than by what chemistry it must contain. The pathway by which any non-Portland chemistry could reach the market at scale.

05Details worth keeping

  • The industry’s shape follows the rock. Portland kilns sit next to limestone quarries because about half the limestone’s weight leaves as CO2, so shipping the raw stone is wasteful. The powder then travels by train or boat to local ready-mix producers, roughly 80% of which are independently owned.
  • Cement kilns double as waste disposal. At 1,500 degrees they vaporize medical waste, tar paper, unrecyclable plastics, tires and, in Saudi Arabia, camel dung. Ellis notes that a tire vaporizes in seconds rather than producing the black smoke of a tire fire, and calls this a genuine role in the circular economy.
  • The properties that matter are the ones that cut labor cost. Compressive strength of about 30 megapascals at 30 days, plus early strength, quick set and enough flow out of the truck that it does not need extra water. Portland cement won because setting fast let us build vertically and quickly, and Ellis notes it has long overshot what many of its thousands of applications actually need.
  • Roman cement, one part burnt lime and one part volcanic ash, proved extraordinarily durable. Portland is a roughly 200-year-old near-accident: someone found that the right calcium-to-silica ratio taken to an unusually high temperature produced a new phase.
  • Structural engineers deliberately bury rebar deeper than structural need requires, because the carbonation front advancing from the surface will eventually reach it. The same reaction that makes concrete a CO2 sink eventually brings the building down.
  • Ellis reports strong and growing corporate demand in her three years at Sublime, driven by internal carbon prices and scope 3 accounting.

06Claims worth citing

All figures as stated on 2022-11-17 and now nearly four years old. Cement prices, fly ash availability and the status of any pre-commercial process should be re-checked before quoting.

  • About one ton of CO2 per ton of cement, split roughly half fuel and half limestone. Both figures are explicitly rounded. Ellis
  • Cement is responsible for something on the order of 6-8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, roughly level with steel as the largest industrial source. (Kann) Note that he rounds this to 8% of global emissions when closing the episode, and the show-notes blurb states 8% of global CO2 as a flat fact. Ellis never gives a global percentage.
  • Around 30 billion tons of concrete a year, three times as much per capita as 40 years ago. (Kann) Ellis separately calls cement the most massively produced manmade material and second most consumed after water.
  • Concrete is about 90% rocks and 10% cement. Ellis
  • Portland cement around $130 a ton. Ellis
  • Target compressive strength about 30 megapascals after 30 days. Ellis
  • Calcination begins around 1,000 degrees Celsius; tricalcium silicate is stable only around 1,500 degrees. Ellis
  • Supplementary materials can be blended to about 30% before performance dilutes. The jump from there to “at best a 30% emissions reduction” is Kann’s, which Ellis accepts. Kann and Ellis
  • An average small Portland plant makes a million tons a year, ranging up to three, four or five million. Ellis
  • About 80% of ready-mix concrete plants are independently owned. Ellis
  • Natural recarbonation can reclaim only about half of concrete’s original CO2 footprint, over decades to a century or more. Ellis
  • Sublime’s capture cost from the limestone route: less than $10 a ton, for a process not yet operating at commercial scale. Ellis, about her own company
  • Sublime’s cement claimed to have the same embodied energy as Portland cement today, with a pathway to half. Ellis, about her own company
  • Cost structure is stated two ways that do not quite line up: first that 90% of the total installed cost of concrete is contractor labor, later that 90% of the cost is labor and 5% is materials. The second leaves a gap and refers to cement rather than installed concrete. Worth reading the transcript before quoting either. Ellis

07Where it’s contested

  • The disclosure. Kann states on air that EIP is an investor in Sublime and that he is biased, which is routine for this show. The practical consequence is narrow: the capture cost, the embodied-energy parity and the strength claim all describe a process that had not been built at scale, so they are company design figures rather than measured results, and no plant size, cost per ton or timeline comes up. Kann does not press on any of them.
  • Whether a 30% blend is a 30% emissions cut. Ellis raises, without resolving, that fly ash carries embodied carbon and that its footprint depends on how you allocate emissions between the electricity and the ash. The substitution ceiling and the emissions ceiling are therefore not the same number.
  • The CO2-injection claim is reported at arm’s length. Ellis says adding CO2 to ready-mix “is said to” improve strength and so reduce cement use. She does not endorse or quantify it.
  • Whether concrete’s natural CO2 uptake matters globally. Ellis thinks it does; she then caps it at half the original footprint, and Kann pushes back on the timescale, noting decades to centuries is longer than the problem allows.
  • The load-bearing assumption is adoption, not chemistry. The entire path for a non-Portland cement runs through performance-based standards, which are described as emerging rather than established. Both speakers call the industry conservative and slow-moving, and Ellis adds “for good reason.”
  • Clean electricity is assumed rather than examined. Kann flags that electrifying the process only decarbonizes it if the power is low-carbon, says “let’s assume we do,” and the conversation moves on.

Cite as: “Fixing cement’s carbon problem,” The Energy Transition for the Rest of Us, note on Catalyst with Shayle Kann, November 17, 2022. CC BY 4.0. View the Markdown