Steel For Fuel N° 041 of 56 30 Jun 2025
Full Steam Ahead
by Addison Stark, CEO and co-founder, AtmosZero
In this note
The question
Why is industrial steam still raised by burning fossil fuel, and what would it take to change that?
The answer
Not physics but operating cost: clean alternatives exist and none has yet been proven cost-competitive at scale. Stark argues the missing step is a standardized, factory-built product that drops into an existing boiler room in place of a bespoke engineering project, with heat pumps serving temperatures up to about 200 °C and thermal storage serving higher ones.
03The argument
Steam is the thermal backbone of food and beverage, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper and chemical production, because it transfers heat at reliable pressures and controllable temperatures; it also heats neighborhoods, campuses and older large buildings through district systems. That makes the boiler that raises it, in his framing, one of the most overlooked levers for cutting industrial emissions. The technology itself has barely moved since Babcock & Wilcox mass-produced the safety boiler in 1867, and Stark’s explanation is economics rather than neglect. Conventional boilers are cheap, reliable and easy to build and maintain, so every lower-carbon option has to beat them on running cost, and so far none does. Switching the fuel to biomass or renewable natural gas raises operating costs several-fold unless the site already makes waste biomass of its own, as pulp and paper mills do. Electric boilers are simple and close to plug-and-play, but they turn one unit of electricity into one unit of steam heat, which leaves them well above fossil systems on running cost.
Two approaches escape that arithmetic in different ways, and Stark treats them as complementary rather than competing. A heat pump moves and upgrades heat that already exists instead of releasing it from a fuel, so it produces the same steam from a fraction of the energy input; that efficiency is also what keeps its demand on the grid connection modest. The catch is how industrial heat pumps have been built to date. They are custom-engineered around a particular site’s waste heat, which raises capital cost, engineering complexity and downtime, and ties the steam supply to that waste stream, so if the waste heat stops the steam stops. Thermal energy storage takes the opposite route. It charges on cheap off-peak or on-site power, holds the heat, and discharges steam on demand, which is how it bridges intermittent supply and reaches temperatures a heat pump cannot; Stark’s qualifier is that this works where low-cost renewable electricity is available.
The turn in the piece is that neither technology is held back by its thermodynamics any longer. What has held them back is that industrial heat has stayed in pilots, demonstrations and site-specific installations while solar panels, lithium-ion batteries and residential heat pumps scaled as modular, factory-built products. Stark’s proposition, and here he is describing his own company, is that a heat pump drawing on ambient air rather than waste heat can be standardized and sold as a drop-in boiler replacement, which removes the custom engineering, the site dependency and most of the downtime at once. He claims AtmosZero’s Boiler 2.0 is among the first commercial systems to match or beat a combustion boiler’s operating cost while emitting no carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides or particulates, and describes the company as working to commercialize it, so that comparison is the company’s own target rather than an independently measured result. The closing claim is a general one: scaling hardware takes a breakthrough product, mass manufacturing and market pull, and he argues industrial electrification now has all three within reach.
04What you need to know first
- Industrial steam boiler
- Equipment that burns fuel to boil water and deliver steam at a set pressure and temperature, used for process heat, sterilization, concentrating solutions and driving reactions.
- Industrial heat pump
- A machine that moves heat from a cooler source to a hotter output rather than generating it by combustion, which is why it can deliver the same heat for far less input energy than an electric boiler.
- Waste-heat integration
- Feeding a heat pump from hot streams an existing process already rejects. It improves efficiency but couples the two systems and requires custom design.
- Thermal energy storage
- Charging a heat-retaining medium with electricity when power is cheap and discharging heat later, decoupling when power is bought from when heat is needed.
05Details worth keeping
- The piece is a reprint: a closing note says it originally appeared as “Full Steam Ahead” in the July 2025 issue of Mechanical Engineering, published by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
- The bracketed note introducing the post is the publication’s rather than Stark’s own words. It says he was previously a fellow at the Department of Energy’s ARPA-E division, which it does not spell out, and was honored in the 2024 Mechanical Engineering Watch List.
- The history runs from Heron of Alexandria’s aeolipile in the first century AD, through Papin’s steam digester, Savery and Newcomen’s pumping engines and Watt’s separate condenser, to Babcock & Wilcox in 1867. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers was founded in 1880 in response to boiler explosions.
- Con Edison runs what he calls the world’s largest steam network in Manhattan.
- Rondo Energy’s brick-based heat batteries are his example of thermal storage charged on off-peak power.
- Research institutions and companies across Europe and Asia have demonstrated steam-generating heat pumps above 120 °C, but cost, complexity and reliability kept them from scaling.
- A chart credited to the Renewable Thermal Collaborative breaks industrial thermal demand down by temperature, and a second credited to the International Energy Agency shows heat pump capacity in buildings by country and region to 2030. Neither is referred to in the prose and their numbers sit only in the images. A “How Boiler 2.0 Works” video is referenced and likewise not reproduced.
06Claims worth citing
All figures as stated on 2025-06-30. The Boiler 2.0 figures are the company’s own, for a product it describes itself as working to commercialize.
- About 37 percent of the fossil fuel consumed by United States industry is used to produce steam, and global primary energy use for steam is equivalent to that used for steel production. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, cited by Stark
- Steam generation delivers more than 50 percent of all industrial heat and accounts for roughly 8 percent of global energy use. Stark, no source given
- Fossil-fuelled boilers emit 2.25 gigatons of greenhouse gases a year, on par with steel or cement production. Stark
- Fuel switching to biomass or renewable natural gas raises operating costs two to tenfold or more, unless the facility already produces waste biomass onsite. Stark
- Electric boiler operating costs can be two to three times those of fossil-fuelled systems. Stark
- Heat pumps are effective for applications up to 200 °C; thermal storage delivers much higher temperatures. Stark
- Con Edison’s Manhattan steam system has 105 miles of steam mains heating 1.8 billion square feet of residential, 700 million square feet of commercial and 90 million square feet of industrial floorspace. Stark
- Boiler 2.0 draws on ambient air and produces saturated steam at up to 150 °C, and is described as among the first commercial systems to match or beat the operating cost of combustion boilers with no carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide or particulate emissions. AtmosZero, via Stark
07Where it’s contested
Nothing is contested in the piece; there is one author and no reply. What is worth recording is what the argument rests on and does not defend.
- The author has an interest, stated at the top. The opening note discloses that AtmosZero is an Energy Impact Partners portfolio company and that the views are Stark’s, and the final third of the essay describes his company’s product.
- The claim carrying the argument is the one claim without numbers. That Boiler 2.0 matches or beats a combustion boiler on operating cost is the hinge of the piece, and it arrives with no efficiency figure, no electricity price assumption and no reference case, while every rival technology is costed at least loosely.
- Thermal storage is treated generously and conditionally. He says it is “poised to become” viable where low-cost renewable electricity is available, which is a qualifier the surrounding enthusiasm does not repeat.
- The electricity itself goes unexamined. Beyond noting that heat pump efficiency reduces grid interconnection requirements, the piece does not ask where the clean power for electrified steam comes from, or what it costs.